IAN ON FILM

THE WALL

The Zone of Interest

Glazer builds a horror film out of a happy family and a garden wall. What lives on the other side of that wall, you are never shown — and never allowed to forget.

The Zone of Interest is the most disturbing film I have seen in a decade, and it never shows you a single atrocity. That is the whole terrible point.

Jonathan Glazer plants his camera in the home of Rudolf Höss, commandant of Auschwitz, and his wife Hedwig, who have built a sunlit domestic idyll directly against the camp wall. There are children, a pool, a greenhouse, dinner parties. The genocide is entirely off-screen — present only as sound. And what sound: Mica Levi and the designers turn the soundtrack into the real film, a constant low industrial dread, gunshots and shouts and the dragon-breath of the crematoria, bleeding under the birdsong like a stain you can’t scrub out.

Sandra Hüller is monstrous precisely because she is so ordinary, a woman fussing over fur coats and flowerbeds while the unthinkable happens twenty feet away. Christian Friedel’s Höss is a mid-level bureaucrat, more animated by a logistics meeting than by mass murder. Glazer’s clinical, surveillance-style framing refuses any catharsis. There are no monsters here, only managers.

It is a difficult, deliberately airless watch, and a couple of its formal gambits — a thermal-camera interlude, a flash-forward to the present — feel more like statements than discoveries. But the film’s argument is unanswerable. Evil does not arrive with horns. It plants tulips. It complains about the commute.

By withholding the horror, Glazer implicates the viewer in the act of not-looking — the exact crime the Höss family has perfected. You leave having seen nothing and witnessed everything. It is austere, brilliant, and almost unbearable, and it should be.

Glazer builds a horror film out of a happy family and a garden wall. What lives on the other side of that wall, you are never shown — and never allowed to forget.